[kwrk]

Habe mich in deinem Link bis Kapitel 8 vorgearbeitet + zwischendurch woandershin gehüpft :

Kapitel 7:
Because black holes can form from matter, the constituents of black holes are also the constituents of matter. Because black holes are configurations of space, the constituents of black holes are also the constituents of space. Therefore, black holes, space and matter are composed of common constituents.

Gegenbeispiel:
Because photons can form from matter (Annihilation), the constituents of photons are also the constituents of matter. Because photons are configurations of space (ART), the constituents of photons are also the constituents of space. Therefore, photons, space and matter are composed of common constituents.
Eine Annahme, nicht mehr. Der folgende Schluss ist mmn damit nicht begründbar:
As a consequence, both space and particles are made of Planck-sized degrees of freedom that fluctuate.

Kapitel 8:
Because the common constituents make up empty space, which is extended, the constituents of space must be extended as well. Conversely, extended space cannot be made of constituents which are of Planck size in all directions.
Warum geht Planck size in 3D nicht (oder 4D – dann wär’s invariant) ?

Because the common constituents make up empty space, which is extended to cosmological distances, the constituents of space must be so as well.
Da sehe ich überhaupt keinen zwingenden Zusammenhang. Vorher argumentiertst du mit einem BH. Das hat eine Grenze.

arXiv:2302.10754v1 Fig. 10:
Was ist – physikalisch – der Unterschied zwischen einem Quark und Quark + Higgs?

Color charge is given by the orientation of the three-ended side of a quark tangle in space.
Wie hat man sich das vorzustellen? Orientierung in Bezug auf was?