Ich brauch noch ein bisschen, bis ich fertig bin. Bis dahin mal der Vollständigkeit halber die bemängelte Stelle mit Fußnoten, damit nachvollziehbar ist, dass da wirklich nur zitiert wird:
Zitat:
Study after study comes to the same conclusion. One found that, for individuals in developed nations, going vegetarian would reduce emissions by just 4.3 percent, on average.[16] And yet another found that, if every American went vegan, emissions would decline by just 2.6 percent.[17]
Plant-based diets, researchers find, are cheaper than those that include meat. As a result, people often end up spending their money on things that use energy, like consumer products. This phenomenon is known as the rebound effect. If consumers respent their saved income on consumer goods, which require energy, the net energy savings would only be .07 percent, and the net carbon reduction just 2 percent.[18]
|
16. Elinor Hallström et al., “Environmental impact of dietary change: A
systematic review,” Journal of Cleaner Production 91 (March 15,
2015),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.201y4.12.008. The best
estimate of emissions reductions of going vegetarian was 540kg,
while average developed nation CO2 (Annex I) is 12.44t CO2.
17. Robin R. White and Mary Beth Hall, “Nutritional and greenhouse gas
impacts of removing animals from US agriculture,” Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 114, no. 48 (2017),
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707322114.
18. Janina Grabs, “The rebound effects of switching to vegetarianism. A
microeconomic analysis of Swedish consumption behavior,”
Ecological Economics 116 (2015): 270–279,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.030.